The ProductID structure is a 4-digit value. However, prior to AutoCAD 2006, the ProductID structure was only 3-digits with a single [p] value. Due to the number of products based on AutoCAD, in AutoCAD 2006 structure was changed to 4-digits.
autocad plant 3d 2013 serial number and product 15
ProductID's for AutoCAD 2013-based products:B000 Autodesk Civil 3DB001 AutoCAD B00A AutoCAD OEM B002 MapB004 AutoCAD ArchitectureB005 AutoCAD Mechanical (ACADM)B006 Building SystemsB007 AutoCAD Electrical (ACADE)B009 AutoCAD LTB013 Inventor Professional (AIP)B016 AutoCAD P & ID - 2DB017 AutoCAD Plant 3DB022 Autodesk Utility DesignB028 DWG TrueViewB029 AutoCAD ecscad B030 AutoCAD Structural Detailing
Find Serial Numbers and Product Keys in Autodesk Account: Your Serial Number and Product Key are displayed in your Autodesk Account in the product tray on the Products & Services page and also again in the Software Download window. Note about serial number visibility in Autodesk Account: Only account administrators, such as Contract Managers and Software Coordinators, and Named Users with assigned software benefits will see serial numbers in Autodesk Account. You are the account administrator if you purchased a software subscription using your Autodesk Account or were assigned the role of Contract Manager or Software Coordinator by your company. If you do not see the software you wish to activate in your Autodesk account or see the message \"Contact your admin for serial numbers,\" you need to contact the contract administrator. Only an administrator can assign you as a Named User or End User and give you permissions to download and activate the software.
If, for whatever reason, you cannot locate your product key, there is another method: 1. Using your installation media, (USB key, DVD, download folder, etc.) navigate to the location of the setup.exe file for your Autodesk product. 2. In that folder, look for a file named MID.txt, MID01.txt, MID02.txt or some variation on that name. 3. Open this file in notepad and verify that the product name is what you expected it to be. 4. The first five characters of the part number should also be the product key for that product.
One of the DFX approaches is Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DFMA). Numerous companies worldwide have utilized DFMA to create product designs that utilize the most efficient manufacturing and assembly processes. The application of DFMA to the Taurus automobile line resulted in annual savings of over $1 billion for Ford Motor Company. By implementing DFMA, McDonnell Douglas Corporation reduced the number of parts by 37% and fastener count by 46% on average . Reducing the time required to design and manufacture a product is crucial for the successful completion of any product in terms of cost and schedule. DFMA is a strategy for reducing costs that entails disassembling a product into its most essential components. Boothroyd articulated various DFMA and DFA tools for concurrent engineering and asserted that the design process affects (determines) approximately 70% of the total cost, despite the design process requiring only 5% of the total cost . El-Nounu et al  created a DFA model for product redesign that considers costs, failure analysis, component obsolescence, and operational difficulty. It contributes to the improvement of product design by taking into account the failure mode of an existing product. Paganin  defines reliability as the probability that a component, system, or process will operate without failure within a specified period of time and under predetermined conditions.
DFMA aims to simplify product structure to facilitate assembly and improve components to facilitate production. In addition, it allows designers to reduce the number of components used, simplify and restructure the manufacturing procedures, use standard parts and materials throughout the product line, and eliminate or reduce the number of adjustments required [25,26]. Table 1 summarizes several studies that apply the DFMA framework to integrated product design.
Table 6 compares the old and new gas stoves. The new design outperforms the previous one on several fronts, including minimum number of items reduction (from 48 parts to 41 parts), assembly labor time reduction (from 719.8 s to 651.59 s), labor cost reduction (from $9.35 to $6.39), per-production cost reduction (from $20.32 to $19.21), and increase in DFA index (from 14.9 to 18.7). Reliability prediction-based FEA analysis results show a minimum safety factor (Figure 10) improvement to a score greater than 1.0 (from 0.5884 to 1.247). A factor of safety less than one indicates a high probability of failure. A factor of safety larger than one, on the other hand, indicates a low probability of failure, and stress levels are within the permissible range. 076b4e4f54